Reading passage
Buildings are responsible for roughly 40 percent of global energy consumption and about one third of greenhouse gas emissions, which makes the construction sector a critical battleground in efforts to limit climate change. In response, architects and engineers have developed an approach known as green building, which seeks to reduce environmental impact across a structure's entire life, from the extraction of raw materials to eventual demolition. What began in the 1970s as a fringe concern among experimental designers has grown into a multi-billion-dollar industry. Rapid urbanisation has raised the stakes further, with the global floor area of buildings expected to double by 2060.
The modern green building movement gained structure in the 1990s with the creation of rating systems. Britain introduced BREEAM in 1990, and the United States followed with LEED in 1998. These schemes award points for features such as energy efficiency, water conservation, indoor air quality, and the use of recycled materials, then certify buildings at levels ranging from basic to platinum. Certification has become a marketing asset: studies suggest that certified offices command rental premiums of around 6 percent and can sell for up to 16 percent more than conventional equivalents.
Energy performance sits at the heart of green design. Well-insulated walls, triple-glazed windows, and airtight construction can cut heating and cooling demand dramatically. The most rigorous standard, Passive House, was developed in Germany and requires so little energy for heating that a small radiator, or even body heat and household appliances, can keep rooms comfortable through winter. Some commercial buildings in Scandinavia have met this standard while using 80 percent less energy than national regulations demand.
Materials matter as much as design. Cement production alone accounts for about 8 percent of global carbon dioxide emissions, so green builders increasingly specify alternatives. Cross-laminated timber, made by gluing layers of wood at right angles, is strong enough for mid-rise structures and stores carbon rather than releasing it. The 18-storey Mjostarnet tower in Norway, completed in 2019, demonstrates that timber can reach heights once reserved for steel and concrete. Recycled steel, reclaimed bricks, and low-carbon concrete mixes further reduce what engineers call embodied carbon.
Water management offers another field for savings. Green buildings commonly harvest rainwater for flushing toilets and irrigating gardens, while low-flow taps and dual-flush systems reduce consumption by 30 percent or more. In water-stressed cities such as Cape Town, which nearly exhausted its municipal supply during the 2018 drought, such features have shifted from optional extras to practical necessities. Greywater systems go further, recycling water from sinks and showers for uses that do not require drinking quality.
Critics point out that green certification does not always guarantee performance. Some certified buildings consume more energy than predicted because occupants behave differently from what designers assumed, or because complex systems are poorly maintained. The gap between modelled and actual performance has pushed rating bodies to introduce post-occupancy evaluations, which measure real consumption after people move in. There are also concerns about cost: although premiums have fallen, green features still typically add between 2 and 5 percent to construction budgets, and developers in poorer countries often cannot justify the expense. Insurance and financing industries are, however, beginning to reward resilient and efficient buildings with better terms.
The most ambitious recent projects aim to be net-zero, producing as much renewable energy on site as they consume over the course of a year. The Bullitt Center in Seattle, opened in 2013, uses rooftop solar panels, composting toilets, and equipment that collects and treats all of its water on site. Whether such showcase projects can be replicated at scale remains an open question, but they demonstrate what is already technically possible.
Advocates argue that the decisive shift will come not from flagship buildings but from regulation. When building codes require higher efficiency, costs tend to fall as techniques become routine. The European Union now mandates that all new buildings must be nearly zero-energy, and several countries have announced phase-out dates for gas heating in new homes. If construction is to play its part in meeting climate targets, green building must become simply the normal way of building.